Jenkins, Chapters 4 and 5
Convergence and the Productive Audience
Questions:
What are the linits of participation?
- technological
- corporate
Role of censorship?
Role of education?
- How to get kids to participate in convergence culture
Points:
Limits-
regulation of participation
- copyright
- religion
- corporate issues
fan-fiction vs. "calling-card" filmmakers
pop culture equals mass culture pulled back into folk culture
Critiques:
Harry Potter chapter looks at only one example of fan-produced media
Focus on censorship draws attention away from questions of access
Boyle and Halleck's opinions on it:
Boyle
New age of guerrilla video
Boyle and Halleck
May be somewhat lost?
Agreement that censorship is bad
- legal system can't accomodate copyright
What does ownership really mean?
- Copyright (Who thought up what idea?) (Relation of expression of idea to idea itself)
Focus on process, not product
What is "authentic"?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Class Discussion Notes 9/22
9/22/09
Walter Benjamin
Questions
- What is art?
- What does mechanical reproducibility?
Points
- Aura – authority, ritual, cult. Function of presence, proximity. Feeling, experience of work of art.
- Mechanical reproducibility destroys aura and authority.
- “The public is an examiner but an absent-minded one.”
- Photography – cult vs. exhibition value.
Critiques
- Should have defined what he though art was.
- Doesn’t account for the individual experience of art.
- Going for the shock effect.
- No flow. Jumps around a lot.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Midterm paper
For your midterm, I'd like you to write a paper/blog post of about 1000 words addressing the following prompt. Your paper/post will be due (which is to say, uploaded to the blog) before class on October 15.
Your paper/post should take the form of a well constructed essay. Please be sure that your thesis is clear and that your examples are well chosen. Please also be sure to employ a consistent citation format -- you need to include a bibliography (even for texts assigned in class) and clear in-text citations. (See here if you're unsure of a format to use.)
Prompt:
In class each day we have listed the questions authors ask and the points or arguments they make, as well as critiques we could make of their arguments. There is considerable thematic overlap from one author to the next in the questions they ask and the arguments they make. In this assignment, I'd like you to choose at least two authors and explore how they address a similar set of questions. (See below for examples.) On what points do they agree or disagree? What motivates them to take the stance that they take? In what ways are their approaches complementary -- that is, do they give us different insight into the "social implications of an information society"?
Finally, I'd like you to consider the critiques we have made of each author. Of the authors you have chosen, can we use the arguments of one to address or overcome the critiques we made of the other? In other words, does a synthesis of their arguments give us a better understanding of our object of study (whatever it is) than either of the individual authors' theories standing alone?
Examples:
my description of the value of genre in Technology/Form and MacDonald's take on formula and the "built-in reaction"
Habermas's notion of the "public sphere" and Jenkins's description of participatory media
Horkheimer and Adorno's conception of the "culture industries" and Jenkins's description of producers' evolving relationship with consumers
Grading criteria:
I will be taking into consideration:
* the quality of your argument
* the quality and quantity of your examples
* the quality of your expression (mechanics, grammar, essay organization)
* the quality and consistency of your citations
Your paper/post should take the form of a well constructed essay. Please be sure that your thesis is clear and that your examples are well chosen. Please also be sure to employ a consistent citation format -- you need to include a bibliography (even for texts assigned in class) and clear in-text citations. (See here if you're unsure of a format to use.)
Prompt:
In class each day we have listed the questions authors ask and the points or arguments they make, as well as critiques we could make of their arguments. There is considerable thematic overlap from one author to the next in the questions they ask and the arguments they make. In this assignment, I'd like you to choose at least two authors and explore how they address a similar set of questions. (See below for examples.) On what points do they agree or disagree? What motivates them to take the stance that they take? In what ways are their approaches complementary -- that is, do they give us different insight into the "social implications of an information society"?
Finally, I'd like you to consider the critiques we have made of each author. Of the authors you have chosen, can we use the arguments of one to address or overcome the critiques we made of the other? In other words, does a synthesis of their arguments give us a better understanding of our object of study (whatever it is) than either of the individual authors' theories standing alone?
Examples:
my description of the value of genre in Technology/Form and MacDonald's take on formula and the "built-in reaction"
Habermas's notion of the "public sphere" and Jenkins's description of participatory media
Horkheimer and Adorno's conception of the "culture industries" and Jenkins's description of producers' evolving relationship with consumers
Grading criteria:
I will be taking into consideration:
* the quality of your argument
* the quality and quantity of your examples
* the quality of your expression (mechanics, grammar, essay organization)
* the quality and consistency of your citations
Convergence Culture Chapter 3
Questions:
-How do we understand the Matrix?
-What is the role of synergy in transmedia storytelling?
-Who is included in consumption of transmedia storytelling?
-Where does symbolism start and end?
Points:
-All media can be included
-attract new fans
-but alienate other fans
-cynicism about marketing versus storytelling
-constantly rising bar (sets people up to be disappointed)
-Licensing gives way to co-creation
Critiques:
-Who is he leaving out?
-topids geared to his own personal interest
-what effect does being a fan have on alaysys?
-Focus on symbolism
-what is the rol of authorial intent?
-What does the title mean?
Dwight McDonald Media Critique:
-NOT FUNNY
-Low Cult
-dumbing down U.S. culture
-built in reaction
-views closely to generic conversation
Horkheimer and Adorno Media Critique:
-Love this clip
-convergence
-depicted on screen
-as delivery mechanism
-another entrance point
-or woudl he even write about it (given its wide popularit)
-How do we understand the Matrix?
-What is the role of synergy in transmedia storytelling?
-Who is included in consumption of transmedia storytelling?
-Where does symbolism start and end?
Points:
-All media can be included
-attract new fans
-but alienate other fans
-cynicism about marketing versus storytelling
-constantly rising bar (sets people up to be disappointed)
-Licensing gives way to co-creation
Critiques:
-Who is he leaving out?
-topids geared to his own personal interest
-what effect does being a fan have on alaysys?
-Focus on symbolism
-what is the rol of authorial intent?
-What does the title mean?
Dwight McDonald Media Critique:
-NOT FUNNY
-Low Cult
-dumbing down U.S. culture
-built in reaction
-views closely to generic conversation
Horkheimer and Adorno Media Critique:
-Love this clip
-convergence
-depicted on screen
-as delivery mechanism
-another entrance point
-or woudl he even write about it (given its wide popularit)
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Convergence Culture Chapter 1-2
Questions:
-Which boundaries are breaking down?
-How are boudaries breaking down?
-How does spoiling affect production?
-How do you evaluate viewer and fan produced information?
-Why do people want to spoil?
-How do people participate in spoiling?
-Why spoil reality TV rather than the government?
-Is spoiling a goal or process?
Points:
-People spoil for a sense of power.
-Spoiling is a community for a reason.
-Spoil for pleasure/adversarial process.
-Spoiling follows a sequence.
-Power that lies in the intersection of old and new media.
-Commodification of taste.
-"Affective Economics" = emotions are being sold
-Savvy viewers
-get entertainment
-personal fulfillment
-Commodification of taste => Group gets influence or production
-Commodification (3 Parts): sappers, casuals, loyals
How would Horkheimer and Adorno respond to Jenkin's description of relationship between producers and viewers?
Media Manipulation:
-H & A: Media aren't actually creative
Views are complacent and complicate in the system
-J: Participation instead of manipulation
Participation, but also commodification
mold consumers
Lucky Ticket
-H & A: Cause complacency- only partially in win ticket
-J: viewers can participate in other ways- we can partially in other ways
Producers
-H & A: See them as all powerful
-J: Pay attention to viewers
-Which boundaries are breaking down?
-How are boudaries breaking down?
-How does spoiling affect production?
-How do you evaluate viewer and fan produced information?
-Why do people want to spoil?
-How do people participate in spoiling?
-Why spoil reality TV rather than the government?
-Is spoiling a goal or process?
Points:
-People spoil for a sense of power.
-Spoiling is a community for a reason.
-Spoil for pleasure/adversarial process.
-Spoiling follows a sequence.
-Power that lies in the intersection of old and new media.
-Commodification of taste.
-"Affective Economics" = emotions are being sold
-Savvy viewers
-get entertainment
-personal fulfillment
-Commodification of taste => Group gets influence or production
-Commodification (3 Parts): sappers, casuals, loyals
How would Horkheimer and Adorno respond to Jenkin's description of relationship between producers and viewers?
Media Manipulation:
-H & A: Media aren't actually creative
Views are complacent and complicate in the system
-J: Participation instead of manipulation
Participation, but also commodification
mold consumers
Lucky Ticket
-H & A: Cause complacency- only partially in win ticket
-J: viewers can participate in other ways- we can partially in other ways
Producers
-H & A: See them as all powerful
-J: Pay attention to viewers
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Notes 9/10
Notes: 9/10
Habermas:
Questions
What is the history of the public sphere?
How does public opinion shape political power and policy?
What is public sphere?
What power does it have in a representative democracy?
Difference between public sphere and public opinion?
*feudal public sphere
- monarch speaking for his/her subjects
*bourgeois public sphere- (small business owners who gained financial independence)
-making government public
-made up of provate individuals coming together
-accesible to all
-gain access through education
-contemporary society (PR)
Critiques:
-takes money
-helps to be male
Microcinema:
Questions:
Role of irony in public sphere?
Role of age/perspective/culture?
Is Digital Video revolutionary?
Arguments
-role of familiarity
Critique:
-provide no answers
Habermas:
Questions
What is the history of the public sphere?
How does public opinion shape political power and policy?
What is public sphere?
What power does it have in a representative democracy?
Difference between public sphere and public opinion?
*feudal public sphere
- monarch speaking for his/her subjects
*bourgeois public sphere- (small business owners who gained financial independence)
-making government public
-made up of provate individuals coming together
-accesible to all
-gain access through education
-contemporary society (PR)
Critiques:
-takes money
-helps to be male
Microcinema:
Questions:
Role of irony in public sphere?
Role of age/perspective/culture?
Is Digital Video revolutionary?
Arguments
-role of familiarity
Critique:
-provide no answers
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Tips for finding articles through ODIN
I promised yesterday in class to post some tips about finding articles through the Chester Fritz Library website.
To find articles, you'll need the bibliographic citation (which you can find here). For tomorrow's class, you'll be reading:
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964).” Trans. Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox. New German Critique 3 (1974): 49-55.
On the Chester Fritz website, you'll find the "Journal Titles" tab. Click on that and enter the title of the journal (in this case, "New German Critique"). You have the option of putting in the year and page numbers, but I usually don't because when I've done so in the past, it has occasionally told me that the library doesn't have an electronic copy even when it does.
So -- once you've entered the title, a list of available databases will come up. Click on one that includes the year you're looking for. For the Habermas reading, you'll get EBSOHost Academic Search Premier. Click on "go" and it will bring you to the database's page for the journal. (Here again you have the option of entering a year and page numbers, but I usually don't for the same reason as I mentioned above.)
If you're on a university server, the page will come right up. If you're not, you'll be prompted for your U-mail address and password, which will allow you to log in to a proxy server.
Now you can navigate through the page by clicking on the year and issue you want -- in the case of tomorrow's reading, 1974, issue 3. Those links will pull up titles for all the articles, and you can download a PDF from there.
Let me know if you have any problems, and I'll see you tomorrow!
To find articles, you'll need the bibliographic citation (which you can find here). For tomorrow's class, you'll be reading:
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964).” Trans. Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox. New German Critique 3 (1974): 49-55.
On the Chester Fritz website, you'll find the "Journal Titles" tab. Click on that and enter the title of the journal (in this case, "New German Critique"). You have the option of putting in the year and page numbers, but I usually don't because when I've done so in the past, it has occasionally told me that the library doesn't have an electronic copy even when it does.
So -- once you've entered the title, a list of available databases will come up. Click on one that includes the year you're looking for. For the Habermas reading, you'll get EBSOHost Academic Search Premier. Click on "go" and it will bring you to the database's page for the journal. (Here again you have the option of entering a year and page numbers, but I usually don't for the same reason as I mentioned above.)
If you're on a university server, the page will come right up. If you're not, you'll be prompted for your U-mail address and password, which will allow you to log in to a proxy server.
Now you can navigate through the page by clicking on the year and issue you want -- in the case of tomorrow's reading, 1974, issue 3. Those links will pull up titles for all the articles, and you can download a PDF from there.
Let me know if you have any problems, and I'll see you tomorrow!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)